When Nyssa met Anne |
This is going to be a hard one to review. A short story at
only two parts, ‘Black Orchid’ is almost ‘filler’ – they had 26 episodes for
the series and JNT didn’t want to do six-parters, which in all fairness was a
very good call. The last two broadcast six-parters were very slow drawn-out
affairs. However, instead we get ‘Black Orchid’, a two-part purely historical
story with a wobbly plot by a man whose attitude was ‘it’s only Doctor Who’.
Terrance Dudley’s ‘Four to Doomsday’ was okay, lacking a
fair bit in action but okay. If they offered him a commission it seems he took
it, he was a working writer after all. ‘Black Orchid’
Peter Davison plays a rather unconvincing shot to be honest. |
Why? Because the plot itself is one of those ‘what’s going
on’ type plots. Once you piece together the shabby plot points and kill the
protagonist there’s nothing left. Instead we get prolonged parties, dancing and
Adric eating a lot of food. The companions become purely functional, even more
so than they have been. Adric is superfluous to the plot again, and Tegan is
just there to explain strange Earth traditions to the two alien companions.
Nyssa gets a double, for some strange reason, and the Doctor spends 30 per cent
of the story wandering secret corridors. It’s naff and boring.
Charleston time! |
What tops the dreadful plotting off is Terrence Dudley
getting himself into a hole with the Doctor accused of murder. How does he
prove his innocence? He blows his alien cover and shows the police the inside
of the TARDIS! It’s not something ever done before and hopefully not again.
It’s purely and simply a plot point. It’s dreadful, lazy writing from Dudley. At
that point the story was completely lost to me.
Peter Davison points out in the commentary another plot hole
where he tells everyone not to let George Cranleigh know he doesn’t have Anne
(Nyssa’s double) on the roof, but in fact Nyssa.
The Doctor and Lady Cranleigh. |
Can't fix your plotholes? Take everyone into the TARDIS. |
Then the cricket scene. Apart from the one ball Peter
Davison bowled on the stumps which took a wicket, it’s woefully directed. The
shots must have been done in a hurry because it doesn’t look like real cricket
at all. The ball moves so slowly, the shots that Davison hits would be lucky to
get past cover, the catch he takes clearly did not come off a bat. It seems
like they had ten minutes to shoot the cricket game shots and they had to make
do.
They dialogue is mostly expositional, especially from Tegan.
Grrrr. Bad. BAD. BAAAAAD.
2.5/10
No comments:
Post a Comment